| SHORT
TERM SCHEME |
| |
Issue |
Ranking |
| 1. |
Nothing
relates to river activity. |
22 |
| 2. |
A
pontoon should be part of the short term scheme. |
6 |
| 3. |
(All
parking on the embankment should go) |
|
| 4. |
There
should be a garden all over the site. |
8 |
| 5. |
(£0.5
million is too much for the short term)
|
|
| 6. |
(Why
demolish when we have got the approved Terrace Group Scheme?)
|
|
| 7. |
(Are
the trees untouched in the short term scheme?)
|
|
| 8. |
Toilets
are needed for the short term scheme. |
16 |
| 9. |
Why
can't traffic be moved to the back of the short term scheme? |
10 |
| 10. |
Is
the plan for the short term scheme a fait accompli? |
4 |
| 11. |
Why
is the Council rejecting the Terrace scheme which is costed/planned?
|
25 |
| 12. |
Is
there anything for the 12-16 year olds in the short term scheme?
|
8 |
| 13. |
Does
the short term scheme mean the rest of the site will be over developed?
|
10 |
| 14. |
We
don't want a pontoon. |
6 |
| 15. |
Short
term scheme lacks a raised view of the river. |
7 |
| 16. |
Why
not use all the of the site for the short term scheme? |
23 |
| 17. |
How
long will the short term scheme be there? |
2 |
| 18. |
Where
could there be a café - is there sufficient room? |
1 |
| 19. |
More
open space needed to walk on - fewer plants. |
6 |
| 20. |
Is
the money spent on the short term scheme going to be a write-off?
|
0 |
| 21. |
Why
not reverse the plan and move the play area from the west to east?
|
18 |
| 22. |
If
point 21 is agreed, what happens to the Bath House (currently
housing the local charity, HANDS) ? |
4 |
| |
|
|
| TWICKENHAM
CHALLENGE |
|
| 1. |
Is
it a hodge podge scheme to satisfy everyone? |
1 |
| 2. |
Will
there be public consultation to choose final scheme and if so
what form will the consultation take? |
36 |
| 3. |
The
public asset must be river related. |
38 |
| 4. |
(The
Environment Trust's proposal for a River Centre will mean active
river use.)
|
|
| 5. |
(Disabled
access for the public asset building is vital.)
|
|
| 6. |
Why
does the Twickenham Challenge exclude the use of the Pool Building? |
12 |
| 7. |
Why
has Busen (a commercial organisation) been accepted as a contender
for the Twickenham Challenge? |
1 |
| 8. |
Is
the lease guaranteed? |
8 |
| 9. |
Is
the list for the Twickenham Challenge closed? |
10 |
| 10. |
Why
is a public asset construction being proposed at all? |
26 |
| 11. |
Can
some of the five contenders get together? |
12 |
| 12. |
The
lease must exclude re-sale. |
25 |
| |
|
|
| LONG
TERM SCHEME |
|
| 1. |
(Need
a guarantee that the number of parking places is retained.)
|
|
| 2. |
River
related activities must be part of scheme. |
35
|
| 3. |
What
percentage of the long term scheme is open space and what percentage
is for the public asset? |
9 |
| 4. |
We
should go straight to the long term scheme. |
8 |
| 5. |
We
should persuade Dawnay Day to redevelop the south side of King
Street as part of the long term scheme. |
12 |
| 6. |
When
will the long term scheme start? |
4 |
| 7. |
Cut
out or reduce parking on the embankment to create a pedestrianised
space and have a service road at the back of the site. |
18 |
| 8. |
The
Council must be transparent and consult over the financing. |
13 |
| 9. |
There
should be a break-through to King Street. |
7 |
| 10. |
Don't
remove parking without replacing it elsewhere. |
15 |
| 11. |
Will
the Council listen to public consultation and change if there
are strong views? |
6 |
| 12. |
Re-classify
a fountain as a public asset (rather than a feature) and have
one. |
15 |
| 13. |
Can
parking be guaranteed only for local/immediate residents? |
6 |
| 14. |
The
long term scheme should be open and community friendly. |
18 |